It was a grey, cold and wet start to the 2013 Sydney Writers’ Festival (SWF) today, but I kicked it off in great style with ‘The Uncommon Reader’. Tegan Bennett Daylight chaired an engaging panel discussion with respected critics James Wood, Geordie Williamson and Jane Gleeson-White on what books have inspired them, from their formative years through to their predictions on the classics of tomorrow. I’ll just pick out a few talking points…
There was a discussion about the moment they began to feel like they wanted or needed to reply to books. James said it wasn’t until university that he was taught to read better, at which point he began to be a better reader, or observer, of the world as well. I think this is true of all us readers.
Both Geordie and Jane spoke of the enthusiasm that works such as Wood’s The Broken Estate allowed them to have. Jane said she still reads with a child’s enthusiasm now, something that was evident when she spoke about her favourites.
For James, he wanted to be able to write about things that made him want to burst out and say ‘this is bloody good!’. He writes not for academics, but for other readers.
Tegan asked a great question about what are the books that these avid readers return to, time and again. For Geordie, it is V.S. Naipaul’s The Enigma of Arrival. From Naipaul, post-colonial literature emerges. It’s not a perfect book, but it’s a most ‘writerly’ book, something he leafs through when he feels a little stale.
James also admires Naipaul, noting A House for Mr Biswas as a very funny and poignant work. But for him, ‘the one’ is Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse, a favourite of mine too. It has, he said, the thing so many works of fiction lack: the ideal ending.
Jane gets excited about any new translations of works by Homer and Tolstoy. But the two works she picked out are F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, with its ‘flawless prose’ (she read a passage of this out, endearingly trying not to cry!), and a favourite of mine: Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights (my review).
Thoughts then turned to books and writers of today that will last. Tegan offered Alice Munro and Kazuo Ishiguro. Geordie split the discussion into local and international contexts. For his local, he gave Tim Winton, admiring Winton’s ability to pull off writing that appeals to a wide audience and is also ‘pregnant with intelligence’. He had a smile when saying Stephen Romei had rung him to say the new Winton has just been delivered (expect it on your nearest bookshelf soon! – no title was given). For a global context, he offered David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest, a ‘generational shift’, and praised the first page of Wallace’s unfinished work The Pale King.
James echoed Geordie’s praise of the opening to The Pale King, and agreed with Tim Winton. To that he added his admiration for Peter Carey, saying that while he liked his more recent works, he is eagerly hoping for the next ‘great novel’ from him, something to rival Illywhacker (my review) and Oscar and Lucinda (my review). (Given they are two of my favourite novels, I couldn’t agree more!) He also noted Christina Stead’s The Little Hotel. For his international, he picked out W.G. Sebald’s Austerlitz, (which is featured in Wood’s most recent work of criticism The Fun Stuff and Other Essays).
For Jane, it is Don DeLillo’s Underworld and Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian. But the one that ‘knocked her socks off’ recently was Atomised by French author Michel Houellebecq, which had James Wood nodding too. Jane was positively gushing in her praise, and has blogged about Atomised at Bookish Girl.
For all that, the one author not mentioned, but mentioned by an audience member in a question was Jane Austen. Geordie swung this to Tegan, who re-reads every Austen each year, (and is an admirer of Northanger Abbey, whereas Jane Gleeson-White said she’s more a Persuasion fan (as am I).
I left with the feeling that if I had only attended one session at this years’ festival, then this would have been a great one to choose. The reading list alone would keep me going with great reads for a good while. The panel spoke with intelligence, wit, and above all, enthusiasm about the thing that brings us all together: books.
I’ll have more SWF musings over the coming days and weeks.
Thank you, thank you for sharing this with us! It is the next best thing to being there:)
Apart from getting drenched waiting for it to begin (Melbourne weather, you understand, Lisa!), it was a pleasure!
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Musings of a Literary Dilettante's
Now then, be nice!
He-he…
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Musings of a Literary Dilettante's
Thanks from me too John … I would definitely have chosen this session too … what blogger wouldn’t I suppose?
So many books mentioned that I have been meaning to read … though some of course that I’ve read too. Atomised and A house for Mr Biswas are two on my TBR (though I’m not much pleased with Naipaul so maybe it will be low on my priority list given all I want to read!). I have started Blood Meridien … I like McCarthy but it was at a time that I couldn’t really commit the concentrated time to and so it got put aside. It comes up again and again … I must pick it up again.
As for Jane Austen … well, she’s beyond mentioning. She’s just a given!
Geordie said to forget what has become of Naipaul and read the book anyway, Sue!
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Musings of a Literary Dilettante's
Hmm, I’ve read three of Naipaul’s books (Half a Life, A Bend in the River and In a Free State) – all before the fuss-and-bother – and while I could see why Williamson says Naipaul writes in a ‘writerly’ way and is a useful introduction to post-colonial writing, none of these three would never be my choice of an inspiring book. Does this mean I am tempted to read the titles he recommends, as perhaps different? Ummm … no.
Much as I admire GW (I have his The Burning Library on my shelves and loved it) I would have to pass on this suggestion. I think I am finished with Naipaul.
I *am* pleased to see them include works in translation, even if the ones they suggested are both old enough to be included in 1001 Books You Must etc. I’ll have to check out Jane Gleeson-White’s review of Atomised because it left me unlikely ever to read Houellebecq – but I’d be the first to admit that I probably misunderstood what it was all about. But Austerlitz is definitely a must-read.
I would have liked to see a rigorous discussion about the state of contemporary Australian literature, of course….
I’m going to read Atomised soonish, and Austerlitz too. As for the state of Aussie lit: one for the Melbourne Writers’ Festival? (I’ll say this much: I went to the Sydney Morning Herald’s Best Young Novelists session, where six young Aussies under 35 read… and four of them were from Melbourne. So the state of Melbourne’s writing seems secure!
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Musings of a Literary Dilettante's
OK, if Geordie says so! I’ll keep Mr Biswas on my list!
[…] blog. To date, John has written three posts on the Festival. The first was on a session called The Uncommon Reader, a panel discussion with critics James Wood, Geordie Williamson and Jane Gleeson-White, chaired by […]
[…] You can listen to The Uncommon Reader for yourself here, or go and read John Boland’s brilliant summary over at Musings of a Literary Dilettante. […]